A strong mainshock is able to trigger several aftershocks during a short time interval, causing additional damage
to structures. The effect of the polarity of aftershock ground motions (positive and negative) is of great signif
icance, particularly on the residual displacement (RD) demand. The positive and negative polarity occurs when
the direction of aftershock is the same and the opposite of that of mainshock, respectively, while these are only
two of the various situations of the incident angle of aftershock with respect to that of mainshock. This study
evaluates the suffciency of the positive and negative polarity in multiple earthquakes for the determination of
critical residual displacements of structures by considering various relative differences between the incident
angles of sequential earthquakes. The structures are schematized as bi-linear single-degree-of-freedom systems to
develop constant-strength spectra in terms of the Normalized Residual Displacement (NRDθ). The results reveal
that considering only the conventional aftershock polarity (positive and negative) may not necessarily lead to
critical residual displacement demands, and also accounting for the variability of various incident angles for
consecutive ground motions is necessary for the reliable evaluation of structures.