10 آبان 1403
حمدالله راوند

حمدالله راوند

مرتبه علمی: استادیار
نشانی:
تحصیلات: دکترای تخصصی / آموزش زبان انگلیسی
تلفن: 9132484429
دانشکده: دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی

مشخصات پژوهش

عنوان
Investigating Relationships amon g Test Takers’ Characteristics and Response Formats in a Reading Comprehension Test: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
نوع پژوهش مقاله چاپ شده
کلیدواژه‌ها
i cognitive strategy use, constructed response, metacognitive strategy use, motivation, multiple choice, SEM
پژوهشگران حسین براتی، حمدالله راوند، وحید قاسمی

چکیده

Tabaran Institu te of Higher Education ISSN 2251-7324 Iranian Journal of Language Testing Vol. 3, No. 2, October 2013 Received: May 5, 2013 Accepted: August 12, 2013 Investigating Relationships amon g Test Takers’ Characteristics and Response Formats in a Reading Comprehension Test: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach Hossein Barati 1 , Hamdollah Ravand 2 , Vahid Ghasemi 3 Abstract The present study attempted to explore the effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and motivation on Iranian test takers’ performance on multiple choice (MC) a nd constructed response (CR) tests of reading comprehension. Three hundred and sixty six students completed a cognitive and metacognitive strategy use questionnaire and a motivation questionnaire along with a MC and a CR form of a reading comprehension test. Indepe ndent-samples t-test showed that test takers’ performance differed significantly on MC and CR forms of the reading comprehension test. The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategy u se and motivation on test takers’ performance on MC and CR test was measured using structural equation modeling (SEM). It was found that cognitive strategy use had a significant direct effect on MC and CR but metacognitive strategy use had a significant indirect effect on MC and CR. The results also showed that motivation affected MC and CR both directly and indir ectly. Another finding of the study was that performance on MC and CR tests of reading compre hension was equally affected by motivation and cognitive strategy use. Keywords: cognitive strategy use, constructed response, metacognitive strategy use, motivation, multiple choice, SEM